Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Principality of Monaco |
|---|---|
| Year | 1650-1653 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | A crowned coat of arms of Monaco — depicting the distinctive Grimaldi lozenge-patterned shield surmounted by a princely crown — occupies the central field. The heraldic device is rendered with fine crosshatched detail on the fusils of the escutcheon. A circular Latin legend surrounds the central device, reading DVX. VALENT. PAR Ꞩ FRANCIAE. & c., followed by the date 1650. The design is enclosed within a beaded or toothed border. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Honoré II secured formal recognition of Monaco's sovereignty from Louis XIII in 1641 through the Treaty of Péronne, ending decades of Spanish suzerainty. These small silver pieces, struck within a decade of that political realignment, were among the first coins issued under genuinely independent Monégasque authority — the right to mint had been explicitly confirmed as part of that treaty's terms.
The Gadoury reference splits this type across two varieties, MC13 and MC14, distinguished by minor die differences that remain the subject of ongoing collector debate regarding precise date attribution within the 1650–1653 window.