See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Drachm - Kidarites Buddhamitra

Issuer Kidarite Kingdom
Year 350
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Coin alignment ↑↓
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Frontal bust of the ruler Buddhamitra rendered in the late Kushano-Sasanian tradition, facing directly forward with large stylized eyes. The effigy wears an elaborate crown or headdress surmounted by a crescent and foliate elements, with voluminous hair or headgear flanking both sides of the face. A prominent beaded necklace adorns the neck and shoulders, and subsidiary attendant figures or symbolic objects appear at the left and right shoulders. The bust is enclosed within a beaded border, and the Brahmi legend reading 'Buddhamitra' (बुद्धमित्र) appears in the field.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Pahlavi
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The Kidarites emerged from the broader collapse of Kushano-Sasanian authority in Bactria during the mid-fourth century, and their coinage reflects that transitional moment — deliberately imitating earlier Kushan types to assert dynastic continuity they hadn't quite earned through conquest. Buddhamitra is one of the few Kidarite rulers identifiable by name on coinage, which itself tells you something about how compressed and poorly documented this dynasty's internal succession was.

Göbl's Kushan corpus remains the foundational reference for attributing these issues, though subsequent scholarship has contested several of his sequence dates by decades in either direction.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE