Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Sumatra |
|---|---|
| Year | 1836 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Dollar (1783-1824) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Central field bears a two-word Arabic inscription reading 'Percha Island' (ڤولو ڤرچ), rendered in bold Jawi script and flanked by small diamond-shaped ornaments. A rayed star with a central annulet appears above and below the inscription, each serving as a decorative device within the field. The entire design is enclosed by a uniform border of raised beads running along the inner rim. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Arabic |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The kepings of Sumatra's pepper-producing interior were never official state coinage in any modern sense — they circulated as trade tokens within the Dutch colonial economy, filling a chronic small-change vacuum that the VOC's successors consistently failed to address. This particular issue dates to a period when the Dutch were still consolidating control over the Sumatran interior following the Java War, resources stretched thin across the archipelago.
The Pr#39 reference places it within Pridmore's catalog of British and Dutch colonial issues, a classification that itself reflects how ambiguous the issuing authority actually was.