See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Rigsdaler No monogram, impressed coat of arms

Issuer Kurantbanken (Banco di Napoli)
Year 1713
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Size 150 × 100 mm
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Log in to see details
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description The reverse presents a repeat of the promissory text set in roman typeface rather than blackletter, restating the authority of the royal ordinance of 8 April 1713 and affirming the note's currency for one Rigsdaler Courant, without ornamental borders or vignettes.
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Log in to see details
Protection description Royal coat of arms impressed directly into the paper surface as an embossed dry seal, serving as the primary authentication device in lieu of a printed royal monogram.
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

The issuer data here is contradictory and should be treated with caution: Kurantbanken was the Danish state bank established in Copenhagen in 1736, making a 1713 date impossible for that institution, while Banco di Napoli is an entirely unrelated Italian institution with no connection to Rigsdaler-denominated notes. The Rigsdaler was a Danish-Norwegian monetary unit, and early Danish paper money from this period was issued under royal charter through predecessor institutions to Kurantbanken — likely the Københavns Assignation-, Vexel- og Laane-Banke, founded 1736, or an even earlier short-lived exchange bank.

Until the issuer conflict is resolved against primary source documentation, attribution should remain provisional.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE