Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Verenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie (VOC) |
|---|---|
| Year | 1658-1660 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Other (Hairpin larin) |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | The reverse face of the folded larin strip is entirely blank, retaining the plain, unworked copper surface typical of this primitive currency type. No design, legend, or mintmark is present. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Batavia (VOC Mint) |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The VOC began striking larins at its Ceylon facilities in the late 1650s to address chronic shortages of small-denomination currency in the coastal trade networks around the island. The larin — originally a bent wire coinage native to the Persian Gulf region — was familiar enough to local merchants that the Company adopted the denomination rather than impose European monetary forms. This copper issue reflects that pragmatic accommodation.
Scholt II#20b identifies a specific die pairing within what is otherwise a loosely controlled series; striking consistency across VOC copper from this period was notoriously poor, with significant weight variation tolerated so long as pieces circulated acceptably.