Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
10 Centésimos
| Issuer | Uruguay |
|---|---|
| Year | 1877-1893 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Peso (1863-1975) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | The denomination 10 CENTESIMOS is displayed prominently within the field, with the numeral 10 in large relief above the word CENTESIMOS, all enclosed within a wreath of olive branches tied at the base with a ribbon. The mint mark A appears at center between two decorative rosettes below the denomination, with the date 1877 in the lower exergue below the wreath. The legend LIBRE Y CONSTITUIDA curves along the upper periphery within a beaded border. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | 1877 A - SA# 21.1; CG# 21.1 - mark anchor points left - 3,000,000 1877 A - SA# 21.1; CG# 21.1 - Proof - 1877 A - SA# 21.1.3; CG# 21.1.C - mark anchor points left, alignment 90/270º - 1877 A - SA# 21.2; CG# 21.2 - mark anchor points right - 1893 - SA# 26.2; CG# 26.2 - without mintmark - 1893 So - SA# 26.1; CG# 26.1 - with mintmark, overdate 1893/77 exists - 1,000,000 |
| Additional information |
Uruguay's decimal coinage system was formalized under the 1862 monetary law, but chronic shortages of bullion and ongoing political instability delayed consistent production for years. These pieces were struck at the Paris and Brussels mints across the issue span, with the two sources distinguishable by mint mark — a detail that matters more than it might appear, as Brussels deliveries were periodically delayed by contract disputes between the Uruguayan government and Belgian suppliers.
The multiple catalog references reflect genuine ambiguity in how collectors have split the date and mint varieties across decades of cataloguing.