Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Etruscan mint |
|---|---|
| Year | 240 BC - 225 BC |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1 Semis = 1/2 As |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Etruscan |
| Reverse lettering | U (Translation: 1/2) |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Cast rather than struck, this heavy aes grave piece belongs to a period when central Italian bronze currency was still reckoned by weight rather than by official fiat. The Etruscan attribution remains contested — the specific mint is unresolved, and different catalog authorities assign related material to distinct but geographically ambiguous production centers in northern Latium and southern Etruria. Haeberlin's foundational die study, still the baseline reference for aes grave classification, places this type on page 274 without resolving the question of issuing authority definitively.
At roughly 84 grams, this half-unit sits close to the theoretical libral standard before the Roman-influenced weight reductions of the later 3rd century began pulling Etruscan issues downward.