See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

2 Reales Type I Countermark

Issuer Costa Rica
Year 1841-1842
Type Log in to see details
Value 2 Reales
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Latin
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description The reverse of the host Spanish colonial 2 Reales struck at the Potosí Mint in 1822 features the crowned shield of Castile and León at center, flanked by the Pillars of Hercules with the assayer's initials and mint mark. The surrounding legend reads HISPANIAR · REX · P · 2R · O ·, identifying the issuing authority, denomination, mint (Potosí), and assayer. The coin has been cut and perforated, with a large irregular hole punched through the lower left field, partially destroying the design, as was characteristic of the Costa Rican emergency currency practice. The crowned shield retains some detail at the upper portion, while the lower elements are lost to the cut. Wear throughout is consistent with heavy circulation.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

In 1841–1842, Costa Rica lacked the infrastructure to mint its own coinage at scale and instead applied a countermark to circulating Spanish colonial 2 reales pieces to officially validate them for domestic use. The KM# 19.1 countermark — a small crowned arms punch — was struck by hand, meaning placement and depth vary considerably from coin to coin. A poorly centered or weakly applied punch was enough to render a piece commercially suspect, and contemporary accounts note ongoing disputes over whether faintly marked coins were legally tender.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE