See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

5 Roubles

Issuer National Bank of the Republic of Belarus
Year 1992
Type Standard circulation banknote
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Size Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Log in to see details
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse lettering ПЯЦЬ РУБЛЁЎ
5
(Translation: Five Roubles)
Reverse description The 'Pahonia' — an armoured knight on rearing horseback brandishing a sword and bearing a shield — is set within a large ornate scalloped guilloche medallion at centre, printed in blue and red. Oval denomination cartouches bearing the numeral '5' flank the central vignette at left and right. The full issuer title appears in red along the lower portion of the note, with the date '1992' at lower right, and an anti-counterfeiting legend printed in small red text at upper right.
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Log in to see details
Protection description Log in to see details
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

Belarus issued this note in 1992 as part of its first independent currency series — the Belarusian ruble — introduced after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the country's formal break from the ruble zone. The series was a rapid production exercise; early notes were printed without the infrastructure of an established central bank, and the denominations rolled out in quick succession to meet an immediate liquidity need.

The watermark is the sole security feature, a reflection of how quickly this series had to be produced. Within a few years, hyperinflation had rendered the entire low-denomination range functionally worthless, and redenomination followed in 2000 at a ratio of 1,000 to 1.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE