See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

8 Reales Type II Counter-mark

Issuer Guatemala
Year 1839
Type Log in to see details
Value 8 Reales
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Irregular cob flan bearing the host coin's crowned quartered shield of Castile and León at center, with the denomination numeral '8' and assayer letters partially visible to the right within the field. A small circular sunburst or radiate wheel counterstamp, applied by Guatemalan authorities in 1839, is struck into the left field, serving as the official validation mark authenticating the coin for continued circulation. The overall surface is characteristically rough and uneven, consistent with hammered cob coinage produced at a Spanish colonial mint.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Latin
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Guatemala's 1839 countermark program was a direct response to the monetary chaos following Central American federation collapse. The Federal Republic of Central America dissolved that same year, leaving member states scrambling to assert control over circulating coinage. Guatemala's solution was to punch existing 8 reales — overwhelmingly Spanish colonial and early republican issues — with a national mark, legitimizing foreign silver for domestic use without the expense of a full reminting program.

The Type II designation distinguishes it from an earlier countermark application, reflecting a revised punch used after complaints about strike consistency on the first type.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE