See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Argyros - Nezana / Nezool

Issuer Aksum
Year 485-500
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Hammered
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Frontal draped bust of King Nezana within a plain border, the effigy adorned with a headcloth. A Ge'ez royal monogram appears prominently above the bust in the upper field. Bilingual legends in Ge'ez and Greek flank the portrait to the left and right respectively, identifying the king by name. The overall style is characteristic of late Aksumite hammered coinage, with bold if somewhat crude rendering of the royal image.
Obverse script Ge'ez/Greek
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Aksum's gold-plated billon issues represent a deliberate fiscal contraction from the earlier pure gold coinage, almost certainly tied to declining Red Sea trade revenues in the late fifth century as Aksumite commercial dominance faced pressure from competing routes. The plating itself — applied before striking — was not deceptive currency debasement in the modern sense but a recognized denominational tier, with Aksumite monetary policy apparently distinguishing between gold for elite and international exchange and these billon pieces for domestic use.

Nezana and Nezool remain poorly documented rulers; the sequencing and even co-regency status implied by paired attribution in MHAC#80 is not fully resolved in the literature.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE