Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Kingdom of Poland |
|---|---|
| Year | 992-1006 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | A Carolingian-style temple or church facade is depicted in the center of the field, rendered in a schematic architectural manner typical of early medieval European coinage. The structure features a triangular pediment surmounting a columned body, with the letters H and N flanking a cross within the central arcade. A blundered and retrograde Latin legend encircles the design along the periphery, reflecting the imitative character of this early Polish issue. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Boleslaus I — Bolesław Chrobry — issued these deniers during the period when Poland was consolidating into a recognized Christian kingdom, having received a papal legation at the Congress of Gniezno in 1000 AD that effectively legitimized his rule in the eyes of Rome and the Holy Roman Empire. Coinage was as much a political declaration as an economic instrument: minting your own silver placed you in the company of sovereign Christian rulers, not tribal chieftains.
The unknown mint attribution reflects genuine scholarly uncertainty — Kraków, Gniezno, and Poznań have all been proposed, and die analysis across the Kop#11 and Kop#12 variants has not resolved the question conclusively.