See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Denier - Pepin the Short

Issuer Unified Carolingian Empire
Year 751-768
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Pound (751-843)
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Latin
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description The reverse displays a partial retrograde Latin legend arranged within the irregular flan, typical of early Carolingian deniers struck under Pepin the Short. The lettering, executed in the hammered technique, is set within the field without a surrounding border, with the characters showing the characteristic retrograde orientation noted in this emission. The die workmanship is rough yet deliberate, consistent with provincial Frankish minting practices of the 751–768 period. Pellet ornaments appear in the field alongside the abbreviated inscription.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Pépin III seized the Frankish throne in 751 with papal backing, deposing the last Merovingian king Childeric III, who was tonsured and sent to a monastery. The coinage reform that followed broke decisively from Merovingian practice — Pépin standardized the denier on a heavier weight standard, centralizing production under royal authority in a way his predecessors had never managed. This was not merely administrative tidiness; it was a direct assertion that coin production belonged to the king, not the church or local magnates who had effectively controlled Merovingian minting.

Morrison's classification of this type reflects the ongoing scholarly difficulty in attributing specific dies to specific mints across Pépin's reign, as mint signatures were inconsistent before Charlemagne's later reforms locked the system down.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE