Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
Drachm Alexander III Type
| Issuer | Uncertain Eastern European Celts |
|---|---|
| Year | 200 BC - 1 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Heavily stylised Celtic rendering of Zeus Aëtophoros seated to the left, derived from the reverse type of Alexander III tetradrachms and drachms. The figure is reduced to schematic linear and globular elements, with the body and throne barely distinguishable as abstract forms. A sceptre is held in the left hand, rendered as a vertical line or rod. An amphora device appears to the left of the seated figure in the field. No legend is present, consistent with the anonymous Celtic imitative tradition. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Celtic imitations of Alexander's drachms circulated across a vast swathe of central and eastern Europe for well over a century after the original Macedonian issues, produced by tribal mints whose identities remain largely unresolved. This particular piece falls into the broad "uncertain eastern" grouping — a catch-all that reflects genuine scholarly disagreement rather than lazy attribution. The Kostial and Pink references place it within a tradition of progressive stylistic abstraction, where each generation of dies moved further from the Macedonian prototype, not through ignorance but through deliberate local aesthetic preference.