See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Drachm Alexander III Type

Issuer Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Year 200 BC - 1 BC
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Round (irregular)
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Celticised head of Herakles facing right, rendered in a highly abstract and schematised native Celtic style derived from the Macedonian prototype. The hair is depicted as bold, deeply incised parallel ridges sweeping dramatically to the left, replacing the classical lionskin headdress of the original type. Facial features are reduced to simple geometric forms — a prominent oval eye, a squared nose, and a small mouth — characteristic of Eastern Celtic die-cutting. A dotted border frames the right portion of the field, and a small pellet appears in the right field.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Celtic imitative coinage of the Alexander drachm type proliferated across a vast arc from the Carpathian Basin into the Balkans, with production spanning generations and passing through hands that had no political connection to Macedon whatsoever. The prototypes entered Celtic circulation largely through mercenary service and Hellenistic trade contact, after which local workshops progressively abstracted the original imagery across successive die generations — each copy of a copy drifting further from the source.

Attribution to "Uncertain Eastern European Celts" reflects genuine scholarly disagreement rather than incomplete research. The Kostial and Göbl corpora have systematized hundreds of die groups, but regional assignment for many sequences remains contested.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE