Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Indo-Scythian Kingdom |
|---|---|
| Year | 35 BC - 12 BC |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | 𐨨𐨱𐨪𐨗𐨯 𐨪𐨗𐨪𐨗𐨯 𐨨𐨱𐨟𐨯 𐨀𐨩𐨯 |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Azes II remains a contested figure — several numismatists, most notably Nicholas Sims-Williams following his work on the Rabatak inscription, have argued that Azes II never existed as a separate ruler and that coins attributed to him may simply be later issues of Azes I or posthumous strikes by successor mints maintaining a familiar royal name for commercial credibility. The debate has not been resolved.
The "Azes era," beginning around 58 BC, was used as a calendrical reference point across the northwestern subcontinent for centuries after Indo-Scythian power had collapsed entirely.