See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Follis - Tancred St Peter with cross - 1st type

Issuer Principality of Antioch
Year 1104-1112
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Denier (1098-1268)
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Greek
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description The reverse field is entirely occupied by a five-line Greek votive inscription arranged horizontally across the flan, commencing with a small cross at the top. The text, rendered in large, bold characters with little spacing, invokes divine assistance for Tancred, the Norman regent of Antioch, in a formulaic Byzantine supplicatory style. The inscription fills the available field with minimal border ornamentation, consistent with the utilitarian character of early Crusader copper coinage. The lettering is irregular in size and alignment, reflecting hammered production on an uneven flan.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Tancred governed Antioch as regent twice — first from 1101 to 1103 while Bohemond I was held captive by the Danishmend emir Gazi Gümüshtekin, then again from 1104 following the catastrophic Crusader defeat at Harran, where Bohemond was captured a second time by the Artuqids. He would never meaningfully return. Tancred ruled uncontested until his death in 1112, and this follis belongs to that longer regency period.

The type is attributed by Malloy as an early issue, predating Tancred's second type, though the precise sequencing within the 1104–1112 range remains debated among scholars of Crusader numismatics.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE