See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Pitis Al Adil

Issuer Brunei
Year 1582-1828
Type Log in to see details
Value 1 Pitis
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering سلطان د العال
(The correct spelling would be: سلطان العادل)
(Translation: The Just Sultan)
Reverse description Two lines of Arabic legend enclosed within a beaded circle, reading مالك الظاهر (The Acknowledged Ruler). The inscription is centrally placed within the field, which exhibits the characteristic rough, porous surface associated with cast tin-lead pitis coinage of Brunei. The lettering, while simply rendered, follows the conventional epigraphic style found on Bruneian sultanate issues of the period.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The pitis was Brunei's primary small-change currency across more than two centuries of the Sultanate's commercial peak, circulating alongside Spanish and Dutch trade silver that never filtered down to everyday bazaar transactions. Tin-lead coinage of this type was cast rather than struck, a production method common across maritime Southeast Asia that accounts for the considerable variation in weight and surface quality seen across surviving specimens.

Singh's catalog remains the authoritative reference for Brunei pitis classification, though attribution within the series is complicated by the absence of consistent dating on the coins themselves — the broad 1582–1828 range reflects dynasty rather than a single issue.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE