Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
Potin/ Lead/ AE Units - Anepigraphic
| Issuer | Western Satraps (Indo-Scythian Kingdom) |
|---|---|
| Year | |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Heavily corroded and encrusted field with deeply patinated surfaces in shades of green and brown, consistent with a potin or base-metal alloy of the Western Satraps series. The central device is largely obscured by encrustation, though faint traces of a design motif may be discerned beneath the patina. No legible legend or inscription is present, consistent with the anepigraphic classification of this type. The flan is small and irregularly round, with an uneven edge typical of primitive hammered coinage from this region and period. The coin belongs to a series of anonymous small denomination units catalogued under the Pieper reference for Western Satrap base-metal issues. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The Western Satraps ruled the western and central Indian subcontinent for roughly four centuries, yet their smallest denominations — particularly anepigraphic potin units like this one — remain poorly understood in terms of local administrative function. Pieper's grouping of 3469–3478 covers a range of dies with no consistent iconographic program, suggesting ad hoc production rather than centrally controlled minting.
At 0.34 g, this piece would have circulated at the absolute bottom of the monetary hierarchy.