See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Tetradrachm

Issuer Minaean Kingdom
Year 250 BC - 150 BC
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Variable alignment ↺
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Helmeted head of Athena facing right, rendered in a provincial 'barbarous' imitative style derived from Athenian new-style coinage. The Attic helmet is depicted with a decorated bowl and raised cheek-guards, surmounted by a palmette crest. The goddess's facial features are rendered with schematic, somewhat flat modeling characteristic of Arabian Peninsula imitations, with a visible earring and hair curls emerging beneath the helmet's rim.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Greek
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The Minaean Kingdom, centered in the Ma'in region of what is now northern Yemen, was primarily a trading state whose wealth derived from controlling overland incense routes connecting southern Arabia to the Mediterranean. Their coinage borrowed heavily from Athenian weight standards and owl types, a deliberate commercial choice meant to facilitate exchange with Greek-sphere merchants who trusted the familiar Attic format. It is less a local artistic expression than a trade credential.

Precise attribution within the Minaean series remains difficult — inscriptions naming individual rulers are inconsistently applied, and die studies are incomplete relative to comparable Hellenistic series.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE