Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| Year | 250-301 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Gold |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | IMP ANTONINVS - ARM IIII AV |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Germanic imitation aurei of the third century occupy an awkward taxonomic space — too crude for imperial attribution, too deliberate to dismiss as accidental copying. These pieces were struck by tribal workshops that understood the economic weight gold carried in Roman frontier trade without necessarily understanding, or caring about, the specific emperor being copied. Marcus Aurelius originals were already decades old by the time this piece was likely struck, which suggests the prototype was chosen for its familiarity in circulation rather than any political statement.
The Calicó comparative reference places this within a broader Hispanophone cataloging tradition that has absorbed several poorly understood frontier gold types by default.