Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
1 Cash - Guangxu Tongbao; Boo-jyi; privately cast
| Uitgever | Qing Dynasty |
|---|---|
| Jaar | |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | 1 Cash |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Central square hole flanked by two Manchu script characters in raised relief, one to each side, reading vertically and together forming the mint name 'Boo-jyi' (Board of Revenue mint, Beijing). The legends are poorly rendered, with weak and irregular strokes indicative of a privately cast imitation rather than an official mint product. The inner square rim and outer circular rim are both present but show the same crude workmanship seen on the obverse. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Mongolian / Manchu |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Private casting of imperial cash coins was technically illegal under the Qing, but enforcement was inconsistent and often nonexistent at the local level. "Boo-jyi" renders the Board of Revenue mint at Beijing, one of the two central mints whose marks were most commonly counterfeited by private operators — the official product was frequently debased or underweight, giving illicit casters little incentive to improve on the standard.