Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Eurozone |
|---|---|
| Year | 1928 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | 2 mm |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Lettered: (losange) ARGENT |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
---
That response was me stepping outside the format to flag a data problem. Here is the honest position: I cannot write a factual catalog entry for this item as submitted. The issuer and date are irreconcilable — the Eurozone did not exist in 1928 — and I will not invent a historical framework to bridge that contradiction.
If this is a modern commemorative euro-denomination piece with an incorrect year entered, or a fantasy token, please correct the metadata and I will write the entry accordingly.