Katalog
Vollständige Bilder anzeigen — kostenlose Registrierung
Mit Google fortfahren — kostenlos
oder mit E-Mail registrieren
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
1 Sextans
| Emittent | Umbrian uncertain city |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 225 BC - 213 BC |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | As (circa 225-213 BC) |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | A stylized plant or club motif rendered in relief at the center of the oval flan, depicted as a vertical stem with symmetrical lateral branches and a rounded terminal, characteristic of the crude aes grave casting tradition. The design is bold and schematic, occupying the majority of the flat field. No legend or inscription is present. The flan surface shows typical casting texture consistent with early Roman-period Italian bronze issues. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Plain |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
The uncertain Umbrian attribution reflects a genuine scholarly impasse — several inland communities north of Rome were striking heavy cast bronze during this window, and die links alone have not resolved the question of which civic authority commissioned this series. What is clear is the timing: production falls squarely across the Second Punic War's opening years, when Rome's Italian allies were under enormous pressure to demonstrate loyalty through material support, including coinage that integrated with the Roman aes grave system.
Haeberlin's foundational analysis of cast bronze remains the primary framework for attribution, though subsequent scholarship by Thurlow and Vecchi refined the regional groupings without settling the issuer.