See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

10 Dollars Playboy Casino Scrip

Issuer Playboy Hotel & Casino
Year
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Size 161 x 73 mm
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Log in to see details
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Black on white, central vignette of a Playboy Bunny playmate flanked by cocktail glass motifs at lower left and right; numerical and text denomination "10 / TEN" in upper corners; Playboy rabbit-head logo seal at right with Hugh M. Hefner's printed signature below, and a playmate logo seal at left.
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Brown on white, central architectural vignette of the Playboy Hotel & Casino building; text denomination "TEN" in upper corners and numerical denomination "10" in lower corners, with "TEN DOLLARS" inscription across the lower register.
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Log in to see details
Protection description Log in to see details
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

Casino scrip issued by the Playboy Hotel & Casino in Atlantic City, which operated from 1981 until the New Jersey Casino Control Commission revoked the property's license in 1987 — one of the more public regulatory failures in Atlantic City's early years. The Commission cited unsuitability of key figures associated with Playboy Enterprises, a decision Playboy contested but ultimately could not reverse.

Hefner's signature on gaming scrip is an oddity. As chairman, his name lent brand authority, but scrip of this type was a controlled instrument, not a souvenir — its presence outside the cage was technically a regulatory matter.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE