See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

10 Pfennig

Issuer Bezirks-Verband Flöha (Amtshauptmannschaft Flöha)
Year
Type Log in to see details
Value 10 Pfennigs (10 Pfennige) (0.10)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Size Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Log in to see details
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Orange and dark green Notgeld note with a central cartouche bearing the large bold gothic lettering 'ZEHN PFENNIG' in black, above which the text 'Gutschein über' appears in a smaller script. The issuing authority 'Der Bezirks-Verband FLÖHA' is inscribed below the denomination, with the legend 'Der Amtshauptmann' and a manuscript signature beneath. Four corner vignettes in orange carry symbolic motifs within circular frames, with numeral '10' repeated in the upper and lower margins.
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Gültig bis 31. Dezember 1920 im Bezirke der Amtshauptmannschaft FLÖHA.
L No 73824
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Log in to see details
Protection description Log in to see details
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

Amtshauptmannschaft Flöha was a rural administrative district in Saxony, and like hundreds of similar bodies across Germany in 1917–1921, it was forced into the currency business by a shortage of small-denomination Reichsbank coin. The notgeld issued under the Bezirks-Verband name was a local stopgap — purely functional, covering transactions that metal coinage could no longer handle once wartime hoarding stripped it from circulation.

Flöha district issues are not heavily documented in the major notgeld catalogs, and attribution of specific printings to particular municipal printers in the region remains inconsistent across reference sources.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE