See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

100 Réis - João IV Countermarked 80 Réis

Issuer Brazil
Year 1663
Type Log in to see details
Value 100 Réis
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Reverse of the host hammered silver coin, showing the remains of the original Portuguese royal design, likely featuring a cross or shield motif consistent with 80 Réis coinage of João III or Filipe I. The surfaces exhibit typical characteristics of hammered coinage, including an irregular flan and partially struck legends, now largely obscured by wear and the application of the countermark on the obverse. Beaded border remnants are visible along portions of the periphery.
Reverse script Latin
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

João IV died in 1656, leaving Portugal mid-war with Spain and its colonial treasury chronically short of small silver. The countermark program of 1663 — applied under the regency preceding Afonso VI's full assumption of power — was a fiscal stopgap: existing 100 Réis pieces were officially revalued downward to 80 Réis to discourage silver export and align circulating coinage with revised monetary ordinances. Brazil, as the crown's primary silver-processing colony, received these countermarked pieces as legal instruments of exchange rather than newly minted coin.

The applied countermark itself is the authenticating detail collectors must scrutinize — weak or doubled strikes are common, and outright forgeries of the punch exist.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE