See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

5 Rupees

Issuer State Bank of Pakistan
Year 1972-1976
Type Log in to see details
Value 5 Rupees (5 PKR)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Size Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Log in to see details
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Portrait of Mohammad Ali Jinnah in Karakul cap at center, rendered in intaglio against a fine guilloche underprint, printed in red-brown on white paper. Bengali text to the left and Urdu text to the right carry the issuer name and promise-to-pay legend, with the numeral 5 in ornamental cartouches at each corner. A scroll panel below the portrait bears the Governor's signature alongside bilingual inscriptions in Bengali and Urdu.
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse lettering STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN
FIVE RUPEES
۵
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Log in to see details
Protection description Log in to see details
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

This series bridges one of the most turbulent reorganizations in Pakistani monetary history — issued in the years immediately following the 1971 secession of East Pakistan and the formal creation of Bangladesh, when the State Bank was managing a drastically reduced economic territory and a shattered public confidence in state institutions. Ghulam Ishaq Khan, whose signature appears in two prefix variants here, was serving as Finance Secretary before his long ascent to the presidency.

The fractional serial prefix variants signal a mid-run change in numbering methodology, not a separate issue — a bookkeeping shift that collectors sometimes misread as a distinct type.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE