See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

6 Daler KM Transport Banknote; Type 2

Issuer Riksens Ständers Banco (Bank of the Estates of the Realm)
Year 1748-1761
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Size 190 x 160 mm
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Log in to see details
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse lettering BANCO-TRANSPORT-SEDEL N:O
UTI Riksens Ständers Bårel=Banco hafwer Se=
delhafwaren Infatt på Transport=Råfningen
Sex Daler Kopparmynt. Och skal thenne Sedel
på 6 Daler K.mt gälla uti hwars hand then finnas
må, samt af Banquen, wid upwisandet, betalas.
Stockholm then Anno 175(7)
Dåg Sex Daler K:mt.
Cuus Daleri Kupar raba.
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Watermark
Protection description Log in to see details
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

Riksens Ständers Banco — the world's oldest central bank in continuous operation at that time — had been issuing transport notes since the 1660s, and by the mid-eighteenth century the format was well-established but still entirely handwritten in its critical fields: denomination, date, serial elements, and authorizing signatures were all completed manually at issuance. The KM designation refers to Koppar-Mark, the copper-money standard, and reflects Sweden's lingering dependence on the deeply impractical copper plate money that these notes were specifically designed to replace in circulation.

Type 2 of the series introduced minor changes to the printed text layout and signature arrangement relative to Type 1. Because each note required multiple hand-signatures from bank officials, forgery was considered less likely than with later printed notes — a reasonable assumption that proved wrong when a major counterfeiting scandal shook the bank in the 1750s.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE