Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
Currency bar Ramo secco bar
| Uitgever | Uncertain Etruscan mint |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 601 BC - 301 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Cast bronze currency bar of the Ramo secco type, displaying a schematically rendered dry branch motif in low relief at the center of the field. The branch is depicted as a bare, bifurcated form tapering to a pointed base, with minimal lateral projections suggesting stripped twigs. The surface exhibits the characteristic rough, uneven texture inherent to the primitive casting technique, with slight irregularities along the edges consistent with the manufacturing process. No legends, inscriptions, or additional decorative elements are present. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The ramo secco bars occupy a contested space in early Italian monetary history — whether they functioned as currency, proto-currency, or simply weighed bronze for trade settlement remains unresolved. Haeberlin's foundational work grouped them typologically, but attribution to a single Etruscan authority has never held up under scrutiny. Multiple production centers are likely.
The three-century date range reflects genuine uncertainty, not carelessness.