Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
Denga
| Issuer | Nizhny Novgorod-Suzdal, Grand principality of |
|---|---|
| Year | 1392-1404 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1 Denga (0.005) |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Central field bears a stylized frontal human face or mask rendered in schematic, angular relief, enclosed within a beaded or geometric border. The face is flanked by simplified foliate or ornamental elements extending to the sides, giving the impression of a crowned or helmeted effigy. The execution is characteristic of the primitive die-cutting style of late 14th-century Nizhny Novgorod-Suzdal coinage, with no legible inscription visible. The irregular flan, a product of the hammered wire-cut technique, results in portions of the design falling off the coin's edge. The overall composition reflects the transitional artistic conventions of early Russian medieval numismatic design. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (1392-1404) |
| Additional information |
Nizhny Novgorod-Suzdal was absorbed into Muscovy by Vasily I in 1392, yet coinage continued to be struck in the principality's name for roughly another decade — a not uncommon lag between political annexation and monetary consolidation in medieval Rus. These dengas reflect the transitional moment when local minting authority persisted largely through inertia, with dies sometimes copying Muscovite types imprecisely. The result is a series of coins whose attributions remain contested among specialists, with several varieties circulating in the literature under disputed assignments between Nizhny Novgorod and neighboring mints.