カタログ
全画像を表示 — 無料登録
Googleで続ける — 無料
またはメールで登録
登録が必要な理由は？ボットからカタログを守るためだけです。メールアドレスは非公開で、共有したり許可なくメールを送ることは一切ありません。それをお約束します！
| 表面の説明 | Central field depicts a stylized floral or vegetal ornament rendered in low relief, characteristic of late 14th-century Russian hammered coinage. The design consists of intertwining plant-like motifs with circular pellet details arranged symmetrically around a central element. The flan is irregular and lozenge-shaped, typical of wire-cut planchet production of the period. The die work is bold but somewhat crude, consistent with the provincial mint tradition of the Nizhny Novgorod-Suzdal principality. No legible legend is present on this side. |
|---|---|
| 表面の文字体系 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 表面の銘文 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 裏面の説明 | Central field bears a stylized frontal human face or mask rendered in schematic, angular relief, enclosed within a beaded or geometric border. The face is flanked by simplified foliate or ornamental elements extending to the sides, giving the impression of a crowned or helmeted effigy. The execution is characteristic of the primitive die-cutting style of late 14th-century Nizhny Novgorod-Suzdal coinage, with no legible inscription visible. The irregular flan, a product of the hammered wire-cut technique, results in portions of the design falling off the coin's edge. The overall composition reflects the transitional artistic conventions of early Russian medieval numismatic design. |
| 裏面の文字体系 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 裏面の銘文 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 縁 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 鋳造所 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 鋳造数 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 追加情報 |
Nizhny Novgorod-Suzdal was absorbed into Muscovy by Vasily I in 1392, yet coinage continued to be struck in the principality's name for roughly another decade — a not uncommon lag between political annexation and monetary consolidation in medieval Rus. These dengas reflect the transitional moment when local minting authority persisted largely through inertia, with dies sometimes copying Muscovite types imprecisely. The result is a series of coins whose attributions remain contested among specialists, with several varieties circulating in the literature under disputed assignments between Nizhny Novgorod and neighboring mints.