Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Obol Massalia Imitation

Uitgever Massalia
Jaar 120 BC - 82 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Drachm
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Crude, schematically rendered head facing left, derived from the Massalian prototype of Artemis. The hair is depicted as a series of irregular wavy strands radiating from the crown, rendered with barbaric simplification characteristic of imitative Celtic or Gallo-Greek workmanship. Facial features are barely discernible, reduced to shallow relief punches. The overall style reflects progressive debasement of the Massalian artistic tradition through successive copying.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Rough
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Massalia — the Greek colony at modern Marseille — produced obols in enormous quantities to facilitate small-denomination trade across southern Gaul, and local Celtic mints quickly began copying them. These imitations circulated interchangeably with the originals throughout the Rhône corridor, and distinguishing struck fakes from official issues occupied ancient merchants no more than it occupied Roman administrators, who largely ignored the distinction. The date range coincides with Rome's annexation of Gallia Narbonensis in 121 BC, which disrupted but did not end indigenous monetary production in the region.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT