Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Arabian state (Arabia (ancient)) |
|---|---|
| Year | 1-100 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Draped female bust facing left, wearing a tall crown-like headdress adorned with small upright oval ornaments; hair falls long behind the neck. The shoulder is delineated by a row of crescents. In the right field, a stylized flower — possibly a lotus — rises on a long vertical stem. The style reflects strong Hellenistic artistic influence adapted to a local Arabian idiom. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | South Arabian |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
First-century Arabian gold staters of uncertain attribution remain genuinely difficult to assign — several small kingdoms along the incense and spice routes maintained enough commercial wealth to strike in gold, but rarely left records sufficient to pin a coin to a specific issuing authority. These pieces circulated in a network that connected South Arabia, the Nabataean kingdom, and Roman trading partners, functioning as transactional currency for merchants moving frankincense and myrrh northward toward Gaza and the Mediterranean ports.
The uncertain attribution is not a grading caveat — it reflects a real gap in the epigraphic record for this region and period.