See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1000 Dinara Nama, Zagreb

Issuer Nama n.sol.o. Zagreb
Year
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Size Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Zavod za Izradu Novčanica (ZIN), Belgrade
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse lettering TRO nama
INTERNA BANKA ZAGREB VLAŠKA 106
nama n.sol.o.
zagreb
POKLON BON
1000 DINARA
DONOSIOC OVOG POKLON BONA MOŽE U NAMI ROBNIM KUĆAMA ZAGREB KUPITI ROBU PREMA IZBORU U VRIJEDNOSTI OVOG BONA.
Reverse description The reverse carries an ornate central guilloche vignette of repeating floral rosettes with fine lathe-work interlacing, printed in red on plain paper within a scalloped decorative border. A horizontal text band across the centre states the security paper clause and printer attribution. The serial number is printed in red below the vignette.
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Log in to see details
Protection description Log in to see details
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

Nama (Narodni Magacini) was a Yugoslav state-owned retail chain, and this 1000 Dinara piece is a store credit voucher rather than a banknote in any conventional sense — issued by the Zagreb branch as an internal payment instrument, redeemable only within Nama's own retail network. Such pieces blur the line between scrip and currency, which is precisely why they surface in notaphilic rather than purely ephemera collections.

ZIN in Belgrade printed the piece on genuine filigree security paper, an unusual level of anti-counterfeiting infrastructure for what amounts to retail scrip. Whether that decision reflects bureaucratic habit or genuine concern about forgery within the socialist distribution system is worth considering.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE