Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
2000 Yuan Panda
| Issuer | People's Bank of China |
|---|---|
| Year | 2025 |
| Type | Non-circulating coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Central depiction of the Temple of Heaven (Hall of Prayer for Good Harvests) rendered in fine relief, showing the iconic triple-eaved circular structure atop its tiered marble terrace with the grand ceremonial stairway descending to the foreground. The Chinese national legend 中华人民共和国 (People's Republic of China) arcs along the upper periphery in raised Chinese characters. The date 2025 appears in the lower field beneath the architectural motif, all within a reeded border. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Chinese, Latin |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The 150g Panda gold coin occupies the top of China's annual bullion hierarchy — a format introduced in the 1980s and expanded incrementally as domestic and international demand for the series grew. Unlike most major bullion programs, the Panda changes its reverse design annually, a policy Beijing has maintained consistently since 1982 with the single exception of 1999 and 2000, which shared an identical design — a decision that generated enough collector controversy to ensure the practice was never repeated.