Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | People's Bank of China |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 2025 |
| Type | Non-circulating coin |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Central depiction of the Temple of Heaven (Hall of Prayer for Good Harvests) rendered in fine relief, showing the iconic triple-eaved circular structure atop its tiered marble terrace with the grand ceremonial stairway descending to the foreground. The Chinese national legend 中华人民共和国 (People's Republic of China) arcs along the upper periphery in raised Chinese characters. The date 2025 appears in the lower field beneath the architectural motif, all within a reeded border. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Chinese, Latin |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The 150g Panda gold coin occupies the top of China's annual bullion hierarchy — a format introduced in the 1980s and expanded incrementally as domestic and international demand for the series grew. Unlike most major bullion programs, the Panda changes its reverse design annually, a policy Beijing has maintained consistently since 1982 with the single exception of 1999 and 2000, which shared an identical design — a decision that generated enough collector controversy to ensure the practice was never repeated.