Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Republic of Uruguay |
|---|---|
| Year | 1869 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | 35 mm |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Central circle containing the large numeral 4 occupies the field, surmounted by a curved banner bearing the legend CENTESIMOS. The central device is encircled by a wreath of laurel and olive branches tied at the base with a ribbon bow, above which the engraver's signature TASSET appears at lower right. The mint mark H is incuse below the wreath at the bottom of the coin, and the entire design is contained within a beaded border. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | 1869 A - SA# 17; CG# 20.A - Paris mint, coin rotation - 2,000,000 1869 A - SA# 17; CG# 20.B - Paris mint, medal rotation - 1869 H - SA# 20; CG# 19 - Heaton Mint - 6,250,000 1869 H - SA# 20; CG# E1 - Specimen Strike, without engraver name - |
| Additional information |
Uruguay's first bronze coinage was authorized under the monetary reform that followed years of paper currency chaos tied to the region's devastating Paraguayan War. The 4 centésimos was among the heaviest pieces in the new decimal series — at 20 grams, it was awkward enough in daily commerce that the denomination was quietly abandoned within a few years.
The multiple catalog cross-references reflect genuine variety confusion: SA and CG listings diverge on die characteristics, and collectors have long disputed whether the differences constitute separate issues or simply production inconsistency from the Paris Mint.