Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Uncertain Indian mint (India (ancient)) |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 100 BC - 1 BC |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Copper |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Lion seated to right within the field, a rearing cobra positioned to the right of the animal, a royal parasol depicted above, and a stylized river symbol rendered in the lower field. Traces of a Brahmi legend are visible in the upper field above the principal device. The engraving is characteristic of the punch-marked and die-struck hybrid tradition of the Paurava coinage of the Punjab region, executed in a bold but somewhat schematic style typical of the late pre-Christian era in northwestern India. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Brahmi |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Mahindramitra is among the more obscure dynasts of the post-Mauryan Punjab, known almost entirely through his coinage rather than any textual record. The Paurava designation links him to a regional lineage claiming descent from the ancient Puru confederation — the same line that famously clashed with Alexander at the Hydaspes in 326 BC — though by the first century BC these claims were as much political as genealogical.
Pieper 1386 is sparsely represented in major collections, and attribution to a specific mint remains unresolved.