Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
Tetradrachm Kinnlos Type
| Uitgever | Dacians of Transylvania |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 300 BC - 1 BC |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Tetradrachm (4) |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Stylized male head facing right, rendered in a highly abstracted Celtic-Dacian artistic idiom derived from the Macedonian tetradrachm prototype of Philip II. The effigy displays a wreath of schematized laurel leaves atop curling hair, reduced to bold, rounded pellet-like locks. The facial features are dramatically simplified, with a large circular eye in low relief, a broad nose, and a pronounced chinless (Kinnlos) profile — the defining characteristic of this emission type. No legend or inscription appears in the field. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND (300 BC - 1 BC) |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The "Kinnlos" (chinless) designation comes from German-language scholarship — a morphological label applied to a specific degeneration sequence in Dacian imitative coinage, where successive die-cutting generations progressively abstracted the portrait until the jawline simply disappeared. These are not official issues in any administrative sense; they are tribal silver struck by communities in the Carpathian interior who had access to Macedonian tetradrachms — most likely Philip II or Thasos types — and reproduced them through a chain of imitation that accumulated error over decades.
Pink's classification remains the foundational reference, though the sequencing of sub-types continues to be debated as new finds emerge from Romanian hoards.