See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Dirham - Muhammad b. 'Umar

Issuer Banijurid dynasty
Year 881
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Central field bearing multiple horizontal lines of Arabic Kufic script arranged in registers, containing the Islamic profession of faith (Shahada) and the name of the ruler Muhammad b. 'Umar. The inscriptions are boldly struck with characteristic angular Kufic letterforms. A marginal legend in cursive Arabic script encircles the central text area, following the irregular flan edge. The overall composition is typical of Abbasid-influenced provincial silver dirhams of the 3rd century AH.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage 267 (881)
Additional information

The Banijurids were a minor Iranian dynasty governing parts of Tokharistan under Samanid suzerainty — effectively autonomous administrators who retained the right to strike coinage as a mark of delegated authority. Muhammad b. 'Umar is among the less-documented rulers in the line, and dirhams attributable specifically to his name are scarce in institutional collections. Album's reference 1433G reflects the detailed sub-classification work done to sort Banijurid emissions, many of which share dies or mint signatures with contemporaneous Samanid issues, complicating attribution without close examination of the marginal legends.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE