Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
1 Karshapana
| Uitgever | Uncertain Indian mint (India (ancient)) |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 175 BC |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | 1 Karshapana |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Five punch-marked symbols applied to the obverse field of this irregular rectangular planchet: a solar symbol (GH 468), a six-armed wheel with alternating taurine and arrow terminals (GH 462), a crescent surmounting a three-arched hill (GH 374), a tree issuing from the corner of a squared-square motif (GH 270), and a bull standing above a ground line with a taurine device beneath its muzzle (GH 145). Each symbol was individually impressed by a separate punch, characteristic of the punch-marked coinage tradition of ancient India. The surface is granular and worn, consistent with the base-silver fabric typical of late Mauryan and post-Mauryan karshapana issues. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The karshapana series presents one of ancient numismatics' more stubborn attribution problems. Punch-marked silver from the post-Mauryan period circulated across overlapping regional authorities, and without a controlling mint name or dynastic legend, pieces like this one resist clean assignment. GH#600 places it within a recognized typological group, but "uncertain Indian mint" is an honest acknowledgment rather than a failure of research.
The apparent base silver content is worth noting — debasement in punch-marked coinage of this period often reflects local economic pressure rather than central policy, since no single authority controlled the entire subcontinent after the Mauryan collapse around 185 BC.