目录
查看完整图片 — 免费注册
使用Google继续 — 免费
或用邮箱注册
为什么需要注册？只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证！
| 正面描述 | Five punch-marked symbols applied to the obverse field of this irregular rectangular planchet: a solar symbol (GH 468), a six-armed wheel with alternating taurine and arrow terminals (GH 462), a crescent surmounting a three-arched hill (GH 374), a tree issuing from the corner of a squared-square motif (GH 270), and a bull standing above a ground line with a taurine device beneath its muzzle (GH 145). Each symbol was individually impressed by a separate punch, characteristic of the punch-marked coinage tradition of ancient India. The surface is granular and worn, consistent with the base-silver fabric typical of late Mauryan and post-Mauryan karshapana issues. |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 正面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 边缘 | Plain |
| 铸币厂 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸造量 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 附加信息 |
The karshapana series presents one of ancient numismatics' more stubborn attribution problems. Punch-marked silver from the post-Mauryan period circulated across overlapping regional authorities, and without a controlling mint name or dynastic legend, pieces like this one resist clean assignment. GH#600 places it within a recognized typological group, but "uncertain Indian mint" is an honest acknowledgment rather than a failure of research.
The apparent base silver content is worth noting — debasement in punch-marked coinage of this period often reflects local economic pressure rather than central policy, since no single authority controlled the entire subcontinent after the Mauryan collapse around 185 BC.