Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
2 Pe / 1/2 Fuang
| Issuer | Cambodia |
|---|---|
| Year | 1650 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Silver |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | A stylized antlered deer depicted in full stride, moving to the left across a plain field. The animal is rendered in low relief in the traditional Khmer artistic style, with prominent branching antlers extending upward and all four legs outstretched in a dynamic running posture. A small pellet or orb appears to the left of the deer's head. The design occupies the majority of the flan, with no surrounding legend or border. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | 1650: ND (1650) |
| Additional information |
Khmer bullet coinage of this type circulated across mainland Southeast Asia well into the nineteenth century despite nominal date attributions — the "1650" designation reflects a scholarly convention rather than a documented mint record, and most examples were likely produced across a broad span of years. These uniface or near-uniface pieces were valued by weight in local markets alongside Thai and Burmese issues of similar form, making national attribution genuinely difficult for even careful specialists.