Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Cambodia |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 1650 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Tical (1431-1880) |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | A stylized antlered deer depicted in full stride, moving to the left across a plain field. The animal is rendered in low relief in the traditional Khmer artistic style, with prominent branching antlers extending upward and all four legs outstretched in a dynamic running posture. A small pellet or orb appears to the left of the deer's head. The design occupies the majority of the flan, with no surrounding legend or border. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | Entirely blank and uninscribed, presenting a flat, featureless field with no design elements, legends, or devices of any kind. The surface exhibits the characteristic uneven texture typical of hand-hammered silver coinage of this period, with natural flow lines visible across the flan. |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Khmer bullet coinage of this type circulated across mainland Southeast Asia well into the nineteenth century despite nominal date attributions — the "1650" designation reflects a scholarly convention rather than a documented mint record, and most examples were likely produced across a broad span of years. These uniface or near-uniface pieces were valued by weight in local markets alongside Thai and Burmese issues of similar form, making national attribution genuinely difficult for even careful specialists.