Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Cambodia |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1650 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Tical (1431-1880) |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | A stylized antlered deer depicted in full stride, moving to the left across a plain field. The animal is rendered in low relief in the traditional Khmer artistic style, with prominent branching antlers extending upward and all four legs outstretched in a dynamic running posture. A small pellet or orb appears to the left of the deer's head. The design occupies the majority of the flan, with no surrounding legend or border. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Entirely blank and uninscribed, presenting a flat, featureless field with no design elements, legends, or devices of any kind. The surface exhibits the characteristic uneven texture typical of hand-hammered silver coinage of this period, with natural flow lines visible across the flan. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Khmer bullet coinage of this type circulated across mainland Southeast Asia well into the nineteenth century despite nominal date attributions — the "1650" designation reflects a scholarly convention rather than a documented mint record, and most examples were likely produced across a broad span of years. These uniface or near-uniface pieces were valued by weight in local markets alongside Thai and Burmese issues of similar form, making national attribution genuinely difficult for even careful specialists.