Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Divercity Theme Park |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 2006-2013 |
| Typ | Fantasy banknote |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Größe | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Druckerei | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Designer | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stecher | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Vorderseitenbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
|---|---|
| Vorderseitenlegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rückseitenbeschreibung | Light brown letterpress printing. Central vignette of a cartoon character town scene, with the Divercity theme park logo repeated on both sides of the central image. Face value in numerals appears at all four corners and in letters along the lower margin; individual town location labels are scattered across the design. |
| Rückseitenlegende | 2000 TV FABRICA RADIO Divercity DOS MIL DIVIS (Translation: TV Factory Radio Divercity Two thousand Divis) |
| Unterschrift(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Sicherheitsmerkmal | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Beschreibung der Sicherheitsmerkmale | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Varianten | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Anmerkungen |
Divercity is a role-playing theme park for children, operating in Bogotá and later other Colombian cities, where young visitors take on adult occupations and earn this proprietary currency as wages. The 2000 Divis note is part of the internal monetary system designed to teach basic financial literacy — children spend their earnings at in-park shops and services, creating a closed economic loop.
Not legal tender by any definition, and deliberately so. Its long production window of roughly seven years suggests the first-issue design proved durable enough that a redesign wasn't prioritized.