Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
2000 Francs
| Uitgever | National Bank of Rwanda |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 2007 |
| Type | Standard circulation banknote |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Afmetingen | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Drukker | Log in om details te zien |
| Ontwerper(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Blue on violet underprint with black serial numbers at upper right and lower left. A vignette of communication antennas occupies the central field, with a reflective security foil strip at left bearing repeating 'BNR' and '2000' devices. Legends in Kinyarwanda appear across the note face. |
|---|---|
| Opschrift voorzijde | Banki Nasiyonali y'u Rwanda lyi noti yemewe n'amategeko amafaranga ibihumbi bibiri |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Handtekening(en) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beveiligingstype | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving beveiliging | Log in om details te zien |
| Varianten | Log in om details te zien |
| Opmerkingen |
Rwanda's 2007 series was the first full redesign since the post-genocide monetary reconstruction of the mid-1990s, when the National Bank had to replace a currency stock that had been looted, destroyed, and counterfeited on a significant scale during and after 1994. Giesecke & Devrient, who had printed Rwandan notes through much of that difficult transition period, retained the contract here.
The "Printed: 30.04.1945" date in the source data is clearly erroneous — almost certainly a cataloging artifact — and should not be taken as a literal production date.